• NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INTERVIEWS
  • EVENTS
  • VIDEOS

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from Blues Scene about music & art.

Bob Corritore & Friends ‘Women in Blues Showcase’ Album Out Today!

March 31, 2023

Top UK Drummer Tommy Arch Gets ‘Lucky’ Break With Debut Solo Single Release

March 31, 2023

Gaye Adegbalola Releases Freedom Fighter Tribute Single ‘Winona’

March 31, 2023

Exclusive: Dani Wilde Premieres Gospel-Flavored Single ‘Sunshine’

March 31, 2023
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Facebook Twitter Instagram Vimeo
American Blues SceneAmerican Blues Scene
  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INTERVIEWS
  • EVENTS
  • VIDEOS
American Blues SceneAmerican Blues Scene
Home»News»Blues Law: A Little Bird Told Me about Cover Versions
News

Blues Law: A Little Bird Told Me about Cover Versions

Brian LukasavitzBy Brian LukasavitzJanuary 15, 2013Updated:April 10, 20201 Comment4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte WhatsApp
A Little Bird Told Me FEATURED
A Little Bird Told Me FEATURED
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
A Little Bird Told Me
A Little Bird Told Me

This is the latest article in the popular Blues Law series by lawyer, author, and radio personality Brian Lukasavitz, “The Blues Attorney”, that explores interesting and landmark law cases related to the blues genre.

As music fans, we appreciate that “cover versions” are a given in blues, R&B and rock n roll. Whether it was the earliest rock, with Elvis Presley re-recording Arthur “Big Boy” Crudup’s blues classic “That’s Alright, Mama”, Bill Haley’s version of Big Joe Turner’s “Shake, Rattle and Roll”, Pat Boone’s “safe” version of Little Richard’s “Tutti Frutti”, or the endless covers of the blues classics, by every band trying to recreate the magic of Willie Dixon’s compositions. So, what is the legal basis for “cover versions”?

To avoid a long article about the legal intricacies of copyright and licensing law, it was common in the early days of the recording industry for blues or R&B artists with original material to license/assign (rent/sell) the rights of their song to a record label. Under State common-law copyright protection and the U.S. Copyright Act of 1909 (once registered), an author of a song has the right to first publishing of their creative work.

Once a song is published by the author or licensed for publishing to a label, any other recording artist or label may record a version and release it in competition with the original, so long as they pay a licensing fee (known as a “mechanical license”). This phenomenon occurred often. The most common scenario in the late 1940’s and 1950’s, was for a blues or R&B artist to record and release a recording with a small independent label, only to have a larger label release a more polished version with considerably more marketing. The result being that the original disappeared into obscurity.

The “Little Bird” story begins in 1947, when Harvey O. Brooks, a successful African-American songwriter and pianist wrote and published the song “A Little Bird Told Me”. In 1948, Albert Patrick and his company, Supreme Record Company, a small independent jazz and blues record label, licensed the song for recording and release. Supreme Record Company recording artist, Paula Watson recorded the song, and it immediately became a hit, reaching #2 on the “Race Records” charts and #6 on the popular charts. Decca records, one of the largest international record companies at the time, seized on the opportunity to release a new “pop” version. Compared to the Paula Watson version, accompanied by guitarist Tiny Webb, the Decca version was far more polished, featuring Caucasian singer Evelyn Knight, accompanied by bassist Walter Page, with vocal and handclapping by Johnny Parker, and background vocals by the Star-dusters. The arrangement and vocal style of the Decca recording were clearly an imitation of the Supreme recording, which Supreme Records argued in the 1950 lawsuit, entitled them to damages compensation from Decca records.

After addressing minor issues within the claim, the United States District Court of the Southern District of California, turned to the primary issue of whether or not there could be an ownership interest in the style or arrangement of a particular song by an individual or entity other than the author. After analyzing several cases, it becomes clear that a particular style of arrangement doesn’t, by itself, create an ownership interest in the eyes of the court. The court then needs to determine whether or not there is enough similarity to create confusion as to warrant a claim for unfair competition. The court notes that to create confusion to the extent that it rises to unfair competition, the public must be unable to easily distinguish between the two versions and its origin. In this case, both recordings were clearly labeled as to which company produced each recording, eliminating the visual confusion. The court, doing a basic comparison of the two recordings, notes that both recordings are of the same song, making similarities inevitable, such as melody and structure. The court then analyzes the differences in recordings, such as the intonation, orchestration, varied harmonization and general expression. The court concludes that a trained or untrained listener is likely to easily be able to distinguish between the Supreme Records and the Decca Records recordings. Finding for Decca records, the Court paves the way for what would become an endless number of cover version recordings of blues and R&B tunes for the pop music consumers.

On a site note, by the time the case was decided, Supreme Records having lost other lawsuits, was no longer in business, and Decca had bought out Paula Watson’s contract from Supreme Records and signed her to their label.

A Little Bird Told Me Blues Law Decca Records Harvey O. Brooks Supreme Records
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleAcoustic Folk Blueswoman Precious Bryant Passes Away
Next Article "Chicago" Bob Nelson passes away at 78
Brian Lukasavitz

Brian Lukasavitz, Esq. (“The Blues Attorney”) is an arts and entertainment attorney with the Lukasavitz Law Group, LLC.. His firm is based out of Minnesota. In addition to representing artists in a variety of copyright, licensing and contractual issues, he is a consultant, blues musician, blues-educator, author and radio host. He can be contacted at [email protected]

Related Posts

Bob Corritore & Friends ‘Women in Blues Showcase’ Album Out Today!

March 31, 2023

Gaye Adegbalola Releases Freedom Fighter Tribute Single ‘Winona’

March 31, 2023

Marty Stuart Releases New Song, ‘Sitting Alone,’ From First Album in Six Years

March 29, 2023

Tom Leadon, Founder With Tom Petty of Mudcrutch, Dies Aged 70

March 27, 2023

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Advertisment
Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • Events
  • Videos
  • About

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.