• NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INTERVIEWS
  • EVENTS
  • VIDEOS

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from Blues Scene about music & art.

Exclusive Video Premiere: Ruf’s Blues Caravan ft. Ally Venable, Will Jacobs, and Ashley Sherlock

March 17, 2023

Exclusive: Skylar Rogers Premieres Video for ‘Love In The Left Lane’

March 16, 2023

Holy Moly & The Crackers Strike Gold With Latest Studio Album

March 16, 2023

Gunning and Cormier Cross The Border, Strings Attached 

March 15, 2023
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Facebook Twitter Instagram Vimeo
American Blues SceneAmerican Blues Scene
  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INTERVIEWS
  • EVENTS
  • VIDEOS
American Blues SceneAmerican Blues Scene
Home»News»Hendrix Sues Serial Infringer Andrew Pitsicalis
News

Hendrix Sues Serial Infringer Andrew Pitsicalis

Barry KerznerBy Barry KerznerMarch 20, 2017Updated:April 9, 2020No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte WhatsApp
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

NEW YORK – March 16th, 2017- Experience Hendrix, L.L.C. and Authentic Hendrix, LLC (“the Hendrix Companies”), the companies founded by the Estate of Jimi Hendrix and Al Hendrix, the rock legend’s father and sole heir, today filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Andrew Pitsicalis, Leon Hendrix and other associated companies to prevent the infringement of trademarks and copyrights owned by the Hendrix Companies.

Pitsicalis and his companies (“Pitsicalis”) utilize trademarks and copyrights associated with Jimi Hendrix to falsely suggest that their products are affiliated with the Hendrix Companies. The filing notes that Pitsicalis and Leon Hendrix (and a variety of individuals and entities with which they have been associated) “have attempted to hijack trademarks and copyrights for their own personal gain,” despite Federal courts having repeatedly prohibited such activities. Ignoring those prohibitions, Pitsicalis has expanded his infringements through the creation, development, manufacturing, promotion, advertising and sale of cannabis, edibles, food, wine, alcohol, “medicines,” electronic products and other goods. Pitsicalis has also falsely claimed he has secured the intellectual property of the Jimi Hendrix estate for licensed products and that his company, Purple Haze Properties, LLC “… represents the greatest guitarist in Rock ‘n’ Roll history, ‘my man,’ Jimi Hendrix …”

Since 2008, when the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly of the Western District of Washington, held that the Hendrix Companies “are the senior user, have incontestable marks and are a longstanding source of Jimi Hendrix-related items,” and that those incontestable marks are “strong” marks, those rights of the Hendrix Companies have been regularly upheld and vindicated, resulting in multiple orders and injunctions against Pitsicalis and his companies, including a 2008 ruling by Judge Thomas Zilly of the Western District of Washington which enjoined Pitsicalis and Leon Hendrix’s prior company with Craig Dieffenbach from any use of the Hendrix Companies’ “incontestable marks” in the sale, distribution or advertising of posters, clothing, alcoholic beverages, entertainment services and other goods.

In 2015, Judge Zilly issued another permanent injunction against Pitsicalis and his related companies for using the “Hendrix Mark” and other similar marks, brands or logos and from using the Jimi Hendrix signature or any similar signature in connection with the advertising or sale of posters, artwork, apparel, merchandise, memorabilia or novelty items. That same year, the Examiner at the US Patent and Trademark Office refused to register applied-for marks “Jimi” and “Jimi Jams.” The decision noted, “the mark is confusingly similar to the registered marks because its mark encompassed the word JIMI (denoting an association with Jimi Hendrix), adding that the applied-for mark consists of matter which may falsely suggest a connection with Jimi Hendrix.”

Just last year, Judge James Randal Hall of the Southern District of Georgia preliminarily enjoined Leon Hendrix and other defendants from using the word “jimi” in the names of their websites, social media profiles or other online platforms that are used to distribute, sell or promote Purple Haze Liqueur and from displaying on any of their materials the Jimi Hendrix signature.

In 2004 Washington State King County Superior Court Judge Jeffrey Ramsdell ruled against Leon Hendrix and his family. That ruling resulted in Leon Hendrix being expressly excluded from the Hendrix Companies business.

Experience Hendrix and Authentic Hendrix have carefully developed a licensing program around their Jimi Hendrix-related trademarks and copyrights in connection with Jimi Hendrix’s musical legacy and can be counted on to seek legal remedy when their rights are infringed upon as is the case in today’s filing.

Previous Related Filings/Rulings

Experience Hendrix, L.L.C.

Al Hendrix Authentic Hendrix LLC Experience Hendrix L.L.C.
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleRock ‘n’ Roll Founding Father Chuck Berry Dead at 90
Next Article Moulin Blues Festival Comes to Ospel in May
Barry Kerzner

Related Posts

Exclusive: Dean Zucchero Premieres New Single ‘Big Boss Boy’ ft. Johnny Rawls

March 14, 2023

Nick Schnebelen Releases ‘What Key Is Trouble In,’ Premieres New Video

March 10, 2023

Mighty Joe Castro and the Gravamen Premiere New Folk-Leaning Single ‘Embers In The Ash’

March 10, 2023

Celebrate International Women’s Day with ‘Women of Blue Chicago’

March 8, 2023

Comments are closed.

Advertisment
Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • Events
  • Videos
  • About

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.